🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an larger panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that federal officials at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing troops from California.

On the previous day, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, principles, and sovereignty as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”